Stockopedia vs Simply Wall St: Which Stock Tool Wins in 2026

Stockopedia and Simply Wall St both turn stock fundamentals into an at-a-glance score, but they're built for different research styles. Stockopedia's StockRanks rank 35,000+ stocks 0-100 on quality, value and momentum for quantitative screening, while Simply Wall St's Snowflake Analysis visualizes five fundamental axes for fast, casual comparison across a smaller universe.

Both tools exist to save time on fundamental research, but they start from different assumptions about what a retail investor wants. Stockopedia leans into screening: hundreds of ratios, dozens of preset strategies, and a ranking system built to be re-run against 61 exchanges worth of history. Simply Wall St leans into visualization: its five-axis Snowflake chart is designed to be read in seconds, with narrative-style writeups explaining the score in plain language rather than raw ratios. The price gap reflects that difference. Stockopedia's cheapest full plan costs $395 to $600 a year, positioning it as a tool for investors who screen regularly. Simply Wall St's Free plan covers five reports a month at no cost, with Premium landing around $120 a year for investors who want more depth without a quant screener's price tag.

Is Stockopedia or Simply Wall St better for stock research?

Stockopedia is the better tool for systematic screening because its StockRanks system quantifies quality, value and momentum across 35,000+ stocks with 350+ underlying ratios. Simply Wall St is the better tool for quick visual triage, since its Snowflake chart and plain-language narratives let a casual investor size up a company in under a minute without reading a spreadsheet of ratios.

The gap shows up fastest in how each tool presents its verdict. Stockopedia hands you a single StockRank between 0 and 100, built from underlying Quality, Value and Momentum scores, plus access to 65 Guru Screens that replicate named investing strategies. That's a screening workflow: set filters, sort by rank, and work down a list. Simply Wall St instead renders a five-petal Snowflake for Value, Future, Past, Health and Dividend, each scored 0-6, with a short written narrative underneath explaining the shape. That's a triage workflow: glance at the flower shape, read two paragraphs, decide whether the stock deserves a closer look. Stockopedia's 350+ ratios and 65 Guru Screens make it the stronger choice for investors who screen a watchlist weekly, while Simply Wall St's Snowflake chart is built for someone scanning a handful of names between other tasks.

How Stockopedia's StockRanks system works

Every stock in Stockopedia's coverage gets three sub-scores, Quality, Value and Momentum, each measured against the wider market and blended into a single StockRank from 0 to 100. The system pulls from more than 350 fundamental ratios and refreshes daily using data from LSEG and S&P Market Intelligence, covering more than 35,000 stocks across 61 exchanges.

• StockRank blends Quality, Value and Momentum sub-scores into one 0-100 number
• 65 preset Guru Screens replicate strategies from investors including Joel Greenblatt and Benjamin Graham
• Stock screener filters on 350+ financial ratios across 61 exchanges
• Folios feature tracks portfolios alongside StockRank changes over time
• Unlimited price and fundamental alerts are included on every paid plan

Stockopedia's daily-refreshed data and 65 Guru Screens are built for investors who want to re-run the same systematic filters week after week rather than research one company at a time. Stockopedia covers more than 35,000 stocks across 61 exchanges, refreshing StockRanks daily from LSEG and S&P Market Intelligence data.

How Simply Wall St's Snowflake Analysis works

Simply Wall St's signature feature is the Snowflake, a five-axis radar chart scoring a company 0 to 6 on Value, Future, Past, Health and Dividend. Each axis is built from a small set of checks, for example whether a stock trades below its estimated fair value, or whether its balance sheet debt is manageable relative to equity. Rather than a single composite rank, Simply Wall St leaves the five scores visually separate so a reader can see at a glance whether a stock is strong on Health but weak on Value.

Simply Wall St draws its underlying numbers from S&P Global financials and pairs every Snowflake with a plain-language narrative, so a reader gets both the chart and a written explanation of what's driving each score. Simply Wall St's Snowflake Analysis scores every covered company 0 to 6 across five separate axes rather than collapsing them into one number.

Stockopedia vs Simply Wall St: pricing compared

Stockopedia does not offer a meaningful free tier beyond a 14-day trial, positioning itself as a paid screening tool from the start. Simply Wall St runs the opposite model, with a genuinely usable Free plan capped at 5 company reports a month, then two paid tiers for investors who outgrow that cap.

Stockopedia's cheapest full plan costs roughly $33 a month billed annually, more than double Simply Wall St's Premium tier at about $10-11 a month, but it comes with a screener and ranking system Simply Wall St does not attempt to match.

Which tool screens stocks better?

Screening is where Stockopedia pulls ahead by design. Its 65 Guru Screens let you filter by strategies like Greenblatt's Magic Formula or a Graham-style net-net search, then sort the results by StockRank, Quality, Value or Momentum individually. That's a workflow built for someone managing a watchlist of 50 to 100 names and narrowing it down systematically.

Simply Wall St's screener is thinner by comparison. Free users get their saved screener capped at the top 4 results, and even Premium's unlimited results are filtered on a shorter list of criteria than Stockopedia's 350+ ratios. Where Simply Wall St wins is speed per stock: a Snowflake and narrative render almost instantly for any single ticker, which suits someone checking a handful of names rather than running a full market screen. For weekly systematic screening across a large watchlist, Stockopedia's 65 Guru Screens and 350+ ratio filters outperform Simply Wall St's shorter, less granular screener.

Alert habits split along similar lines. Stockopedia bundles unlimited price and fundamental alerts into every paid plan, so a screener result that changes rank or crosses a valuation threshold can trigger a notification without any extra setup. Simply Wall St's alerts are tied to saved screeners and watchlists rather than the underlying StockRank-style composite score, which fits its narrower per-stock focus but gives less coverage across a large watchlist. An investor running the same 40-stock screen every Monday morning is better served by Stockopedia's alert system; someone tracking 5 to 10 names for portfolio changes gets enough out of Simply Wall St's watchlist alerts.

Who should use Stockopedia vs Simply Wall St?

Stockopedia

Simply Wall St

Stockopedia suits an investor who screens a watchlist every week and wants the ratios to back it up. Simply Wall St suits an investor who wants a fast, visual first read on a stock before deciding whether it's worth deeper research.

The verdict

Choose Stockopedia if screening is the job. At $395 to $600 a year, it costs more than Simply Wall St's paid tiers, but the 65 Guru Screens, 350+ ratios and 61-exchange coverage are built for someone running the same systematic filters week after week.

Choose Simply Wall St if you want a faster first look at fewer names. Its Free plan covers 5 reports a month at no cost, and Premium at about $10-11 a month billed annually is a fraction of Stockopedia's entry price. Between the two, Stockopedia is the deeper screening tool built for a repeatable process, while Simply Wall St is the faster visual read built for checking a stock before committing more research time to it.